MERIDEN, CT – On December 10, 2019, the Episcopal Church in Connecticut (ECCT) settled three legal cases involving the former Wardens and Vestry members of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Darien, CT. The settlement will result in a withdrawal of all pending litigation, bringing to a close a period in which the former Wardens and Vestry Members filed five different lawsuits against ECCT since 2005.
The most recent litigation began in late 2017 when the former Wardens and Vestry members refused to adhere to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church with respect to church governance and attempted to remove their duly chosen Rector, the Rev. Canon George I. Kovoor. When Bishop Diocesan of ECCT, the Rt. Rev. Ian T. Douglas, chose to support Canon Kovoor and enforce the canons of The Episcopal Church, the former Wardens and Vestry members sued to have their rector removed. Further, when the former Wardens and Vestry members refused to participate in church ordered reconciliation efforts, the ECCT Annual Convention unanimously changed the status of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church putting it directly under the supervision, direction and control of the bishop in October, 2018. This occasioned a second lawsuit by the former Wardens and Vestry members seeking control of the church and its property. Both of these lawsuits were heard in Stamford Superior Court in late 2018 and early 2019 and were dismissed by the court in the spring of 2019. The former Wardens and Vestry Members had appealed these decisions.
In a related action, in October, 2018, ECCT and The Episcopal Church sued 3 former Vestry members and Wardens who served as trustees responsible for holding real estate for the benefit of St. Paul’s. The trustees had sold the real estate in 2011 in violation of church canons. This suit sought to secure the proceeds of the sale of the real estate to benefit St. Paul’s Episcopal Church and prevent the trustees from using the monies for other purposes, including to pay lawyers pursuing lawsuits against ECCT.
Under the settlement agreement, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church recovers control over the funds held in trust, and the former Wardens and Vestry members relinquish all claims to the property of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church. The parties have withdrawn all of the pending matters, including the appeals. Further, the parties have mutually agreed not to sue each other in the future.
The settlement recognizes that St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Darien continues as a Worshipping Community in ECCT. All accusations against the Rev. Canon George I. Kovoor have been withdrawn and his status as a priest in good standing in The Episcopal Church is unchallenged.
The former Wardens and Vestry members have chosen to move forward as a separate Christian community, now referred to as New St. Paul’s Church.
Commenting on the settlement, Bishop Douglas said: “While this has been a long and trying legal process, I thank God that we have been able to reach a settlement that both maintains the Canons of The Episcopal Church, while offering a hand of reconciliation to those who have chosen to leave St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Darien. We are particularly indebted to the faithfulness and hard work of our legal team who have worked tirelessly on the Church’s behalf, Canon Kovoor who has been steadfast in support of ECCT at great cost to himself and his reputation, and the devoted congregation at St. Paul’s in Darien who have chosen to remain in The Episcopal Church. My prayer is that we all now move forward in God’s mission to restore and reconcile all people to unity with God and each other in Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit.”
Here’s a question for George Conger or anyone who might know….
Recently I have read several press releases from organizations that until very recently referred to themselves as “dioceses” (with or without the word “Episcopal”). This morning I read this one, and another on the Minnesota bishop election. Both are now “The Episcopal Church in ___________”, at least on their press releases.
Was the word “diocese” banned under some GC resolution without anyone noticing? Or is it too “patriarchal”? Or did a focus group of 80-something Piskie bigwigs decide that “TEC in _______” would have more appeal for “THE youth”? (am I the only one who noticed that during GC, everyone over 50 used the definitive article, as though there were only one person under 50?
And the word “diocese” aside, these new names devolve into unfortunate acronyms, most of which sound like some form of throat clearing when pronounced. Imagine at Lambeth when the ABoC (who loves his acronyms, TEC being “teck”, for instance), introduces Douglas as the bishop of “ECCT.”
I’ve noticed the same thing, and only recently (like in the last 2 weeks at the most).
What camp does Rev. Kovoor fall? The original vestry didn’t like him for some reason.
I wonder how many of the former wardens and vestry members faced losing personal assets and property in the lawsuits. Scorched earth by the “christian” TEC organization.