The overlooked scandal of the Mere Anglicanism Conference

Robinson may be a strong culture warrior, but he is no leader of God’s true church, and no Christian organization concerned about the gospel should be having him address the church

781

If you interact with certain segments of conservatism, you may have heard about a kerfuffle at the Mere Anglicanism conference held a couple of weeks ago in SC, which included speakers like Sam Allberry, D. A. Carson, Rebecca McLaughlin, Carl Trueman, and Calvin Robinson. The controversy centers around that last speaker, Calvin Robinson, an ordained priest in the Nordic Catholic Church.

Robinson was invited to speak on the issue of critical theory and decided to focus on ways in which he believes critical theories have gained entrance into the church: feminism (and women’s ordination) as well as Luther and the Protestant Reformation. Because some key individuals connected to the conference were upset by Robinson’s critique of feminism and women’s ordination, he was disinvited from participating in a later scheduled panel discussion. You can find accounts of the controversy here and here.

You can find Robinson’s account, as well as the notes from his talk, here. What is interesting to me (and what seems to be a trend in the church today) is that Christians were upset that people took offense to his critique of women’s ordination, but no one seems upset about Robinson’s rejection of the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation and embrace of sacramentalism. While it is concerning when Christians remove someone for speaking against women’s ordination, it should be just as concerning when they do not remove someone for speaking against sola Scriptura, sola fide, sola gratia, solus Christus, and soli deo gloria. Here are some excerpts from Robinson’s talk:

  • “We are all invited to become sons and daughters of God, through repentance of sin and baptism in water and the Holy Spirit.”
  • “Here, we see liberalism at its peak. When Marx says Luther shattered faith in authority because he restored the authority of faith, could it be that he is saying in destroying the people’s faith in the Church, people put their faith in their own consciences. In removing the authority of the Church Universal, magisterium, papacy, et al., people granted themselves authority and therefore made Marx’s job of crushing Christianity all the more easier. He no longer had to battle with a universal Truth; he only had to challenge the subjective perspective of truth.”
  • “The Pope now has even more power than he had then. Sure, he doesn’t have his temporal authority with his Papal Armies and Papal States, but there was a land grab for spiritual authority. He has become an absolute monarch, and as we see the mess in Rome at the moment, this is causing our Roman Brethren great hurt. Take, for example, the issue of a wonderful bishop, Strickland, being stripped of his dioceses. Bishop Strickland, as with every other bishop, derides their authority directly from Christ Himself.”
  • “There is a bad bishop in the Seat of Peter right now, and he has been granted too much power and authority beyond his remit. I think this is probably because the Roman Catholic Church has had good popes for so long; they have been used to deferring to the Pope in matters they haven’t needed to. Well, having a bad pope might make them readdress that situation a little bit.” 

In addition, here are some excerpts from a post Robinson wrote in November celebrating his ordination to the Nordic Catholic Church:

  • “I do believe the Reformation was a mistake.”
  • “I have no time for puritans who protest that Rome is the whore of Babylon or protestants who seem to believe Catholics are not Christians. Both are absurdities. The reformers did not intend to create a new Church; there cannot be a new Church, there is one Church, the body of Christ. What they did by leaving Rome was split the Church. Surely, this hurts our Lord.”
  • “The platform I have been gifted has meant I get the opportunity to speak with Christians across all denominations, with many theological/doctrinal differences, who all believe in our Lord’s death on the Cross for us, and his offer of eternal salvation if we repent and follow him, and are born again through baptism of water and the Holy Spirit.”
  • “Personally, I have always celebrated the Assumption of Mary, as Anglo-Catholics do.”
  • “On a personal level, it means that when traveling outside of the country, I will be able to access the sacraments of Reconciliation, Eucharist, and Anointing of the Sick, which proves impossible otherwise, and no Christian should be without the blessed sacrament.”

Read it all at DBTS