Justin Welby addresses UN Security Council
[Episcopal News Service] Churches are the on the front line of mediation efforts across the world, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby told the United Nations Security Council yesterday (Wednesday, 29 August), in part because they are often “the only functioning institutions in a fragile or pre-conflict situation.” He said that churches and other faith communities are “intimately present where there are conflicts; we cannot and will not walk away from them.” He cited the role of South Sudanese Anglican Primate and Archbishop Justin Badi Arama in peace efforts in the country.
Welby repeatedly stressed that mediation must take place within the context of reconciliation.
“Where mediation is about resolving conflict, reconciliation is the process of transforming violent conflict into non-violent co-existence where communities have come to terms with history and are learning to disagree well,” he said during a briefing that made him the first Archbishop of Canterbury to address the Security Council. “Mediation by itself, however skilled, is like using a garden hose to put out a forest fire, when what you need is rain over the whole area to let new life grow and sustain itself.”
Reconciliation doesn’t come at the end of conflict, the archbishop said. “It must come out of framework that enables us to sustain peace and avoid conflict cycles from repeating in ever-increasing destructive force.”
Welby was the first briefer for the council’s “open debate” on “mediation and its role in conflict prevention.” United Kingdom Ambassador to the UN, Karen Pierce, invited Welby to participate. The debate is one of two big “discretionary events” being organised by the UK during its “rolling presidency” of the organisation.
The archbishop has experience in international mediation and is a member of UN Secretary General António Guterres’ High Level Advisory Board on Mediation. Guterres established the board in September 2017 as part of his call for a “surge in diplomacy for peace.”
According to a UN background document, the questions for the council to consider during the session included how it can more effectively support mediation as a means for settling disputes: how it, member states and the UN organisation can adapt their approach to mediation to take account of the changing nature of conflict and the increase in the number and diversity of mediation actors on the ground; how it can find the most effective approach to building mediation capacity at all levels; and how all three entities more effectively can support and strengthen the meaningful participation of women in mediation and conflict resolution.
Guterres wants to strengthen the UN’s work in conflict prevention and mediation and the mediation advisory board is expected to allow the UN “to work more effectively with regional organisations, non-governmental groups and others involved in mediation around the world,” the UN said.
In January 2017, the secretary general asked (page 4 here) that the Security Council make greater use of the options laid out in Chapter VI of the Charter of the United Nations on the “pacific settlement of disputes,” including mediation.
“War is becoming increasingly complex – and so is mediating peace,” Guterres said as he opened the debate. “Conflicts around the world drag on for years and decades, holding back development and stunting opportunities. Comprehensive peace agreements are becoming more elusive and short-lived. Political will wanes; international attention drifts.”
The Secretary General said that the UN must invest more in preventing conflicts and that must include “investment in mediation, peace-building and sustainable development.” That investment, he said, must be more inclusive of women and of entities beyond “political and military elites.”
“That means working at the sub-national and local levels to help build peace from the ground up. Local authorities, civil society, traditional and religious leaders all have critical roles to play,” he said.
The Secretary General issued a report on UN activities in support of mediation in June 2017.
Pakistani peace advocate Mossarat Qadeem, who followed Archbishop Justin in the debate, echoed the call for including women mediators in the UN’s work. “We as women remain largely outside the door,” she said, perhaps because they have skills that others perceive as “soft.” She said women mediators often strategically choose to begin with “soft issues” as a way to move the parties into the harder ones.
She rejected the argument that women cannot be mediators in certain places because of cultural expectations about gender roles. It’s not about culture, she said, it’s about power. How much longer, she asked, can the world afford to reject the skills of “those of us who are working for peace on the front lines?”
The Security Council last considered mediation and the peaceful resolution of conflicts in an open debate on 21 April 2009. More background about the intent of yesterday’s open debate is here.
