HomeNewsIceland proposes ban on circumcision

Iceland proposes ban on circumcision

Published on

Please Help Anglican.Ink with a donation.

Church leaders say move would criminalize Islam and Judaism

Church leaders in Iceland have voiced objections to a bill before the nation’s parliament that would criminalize the circumcision of boys, saying it would violate religious freedoms by effectively criminalizing Judaism and Islam. The Rt. Rev. Agnes Sigurðardóttir the Bishop of the state Lutheran Church, the Þjóðkirkjan, and the Roman Catholic Missionary Bishop of Reykjavík, the Rt. Rev. Davíð Tencer OFMCap, have urged parliament to reject the bill.

On 2 Feb 2018 MP Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir introduced a bill with the support of the four left wing parties in the national parliament, the Althing. The Left Green Movement, the Progressive Party, People’s Party and the Pirate Party, who hold 29 of the 63 seats in the Althing and are part of the government’s ruling coalition, have asked the state to impose a six year prison sentence on those circumcising boys, believing circumcision to be a cruel practice on par with female genital mutilation.

The bill would permit medical exceptions but would not permit circumcision for religious purposes.

Last month Bishop Sigurðardóttir released a statement saying the Lutheran Church opposed the proposed law.  “In the bill, two different human rights viewpoints are represented. On the one hand, there is an irreversible intervention of a child’s body, and on the other hand, the right of the child to grow up in the religious and cultural practices of its parents and relations, which can mold its self-image.”

“The danger that arises, if this bill becomes law, is that Judaism and Islam will become criminalised religions, and that individuals who subscribe to these faiths will be banned in this country and unwelcome,” she said. “We must avoid all such forms of extremism.”

In a letter to Iceland’s Catholics, last week Bishop Tencer said that circumcision is not practiced by Catholics for religious purposes. Christians were circumcised (ergo pure) in the heart and not in the flesh. However, circumcision was an essential element in the practice of Islam and Judaism. To ban circumcision would mean banning the free practice of the two faiths, he said.

A new poll from Market and Media Research found only 50 percent of the nation favored introducing the ban. The legislation is currently in committee and has not yet been presented to the Althing for action.

Latest articles

GAFCON G26: Bishop McClay Calls for ‘Radical’ Anglican Re-evangelization in Final ‘Road to Reordering’ Talk

In the culminating address of the "Road to Reordering" series at the GAFCON...

Bishop of Pittsburgh announces suspension of the Dean of Trinity Cathedral following his arrest for theft

Dear Friends at Trinity Cathedral, I am writing to share difficult news with you. On...

Archbishop of Sydney’s statement on the Abuja Affirmation, Nigeria 2026

I have been enormously encouraged by the breadth and vitality of global Anglicanism displayed...

IASCUFO proposals “too little too late” for majority of Anglicans

Plans to redefine Anglican identity and share global leadership between the Archbishop of Canterbury...

Ex-archbishop says he needed psychiatric help after Smyth abuse failures

Justin Welby has disclosed that he has been receiving both psychotherapy and psychiatric treatment...

More like this

GAFCON G26: Bishop McClay Calls for ‘Radical’ Anglican Re-evangelization in Final ‘Road to Reordering’ Talk

In the culminating address of the "Road to Reordering" series at the GAFCON...

Bishop of Pittsburgh announces suspension of the Dean of Trinity Cathedral following his arrest for theft

Dear Friends at Trinity Cathedral, I am writing to share difficult news with you. On...

Archbishop of Sydney’s statement on the Abuja Affirmation, Nigeria 2026

I have been enormously encouraged by the breadth and vitality of global Anglicanism displayed...