HomeOp-EdTX Supreme Court Denies Rehearing in ECUSA Cases

TX Supreme Court Denies Rehearing in ECUSA Cases

Published on

Please Help Anglican.Ink with a donation.

The Texas Supreme Court has denied TEC’s motion for a rehearing on the Fort Worth and San Angelo cases, sending them back to the local courts with directions they be adjudicated via “neutral principles of law.”

Today the Texas Supreme Court denied the losing parties’  petitions for rehearing in the two ECUSA cases pending before itNo. 11-0265Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. The Episcopal Church, et al.; and No. 11-0332Masterson v. Diocese of Northwest Texas. The Court had delivered its opinions in the two cases last August 30. In the first case, the Court had sided with Bishop Iker’s Diocese by a closely split vote of 5-4, reversed the summary judgment of Circuit Judge John Chupp which had awarded all of the property and assets of Bishop Iker’s Diocese to the Episcopal Church and its rump diocese, and sent the case back to the trial court. The majority held that the trial court had improperly failed to apply a “neutral principles of law” analysis to the issues. The four dissenters did not disagree with that result, but instead believed that the Court lacked jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the trial court’s judgment in the case.

In the second case, the Court by a vote of 7-2 reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision requiring the Church of the Good Shepherd in San Angelo to turn over its building and all other assets to the Diocese of Northwest Texas. The Court definitively ruled that all Texas courts must follow “neutral principles of law” (rather than deferring to an ecclesiastical hierarchy), and that based on such an analysis, the Dennis Canon was not effective under Texas law (or that if it were effective to create a trust, the trust was not expressly irrevocable, and so could be revoked by the parish in question).

Both cases now return to their respective trial courts for further proceedings — but in a new environment: not “deference to hierarchy,” but “neutral principles of law,” will govern the Texas courts from this point onward. And given ECUSA’s complete lack of ability to prove any ownership interest in diocesan or parish property under the latter standard, the odds favor Bishop Iker and his diocese, as well as the Church of the Good Shepherd in San Angelo.

Republished with the author’s permission from his blog.

Latest articles

Why Evangelicals Failed to Capture JD Vance

Aaron Renn notes correctly that evangelicals “have focused on getting a seat at the...

Faith groups raise alarm over hate speech reforms

Religious leaders are raising concerns over definitions under draft hate speech reforms, which they...

Report from the House of Bishops meeting in Melbourne from the Bishop of C4SO

I'm writing to you today from Melbourne, Florida, where I've joined my fellow bishops...

Canadian archbishop asks govt to reject an amendment to bill that would remove religion as a defense against hate speech charges

To: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of CanadaThe Honourable Pierre Poilievre, leader...

The Church of England must change course

Project Spire is ideological virtue signalling based on ignorance In our world of rainbow lanyards...

More like this

Why Evangelicals Failed to Capture JD Vance

Aaron Renn notes correctly that evangelicals “have focused on getting a seat at the...

Faith groups raise alarm over hate speech reforms

Religious leaders are raising concerns over definitions under draft hate speech reforms, which they...

Report from the House of Bishops meeting in Melbourne from the Bishop of C4SO

I'm writing to you today from Melbourne, Florida, where I've joined my fellow bishops...