Home Blog Page 1137

The Marrakesh Declaration And A Critique Of It

Marrakesh-Declaration-640-320.jpg

On January 25-27, 2016, Muslim scholars and intellectuals from across the Muslim world convened in Marrakesh to discuss the protection of religious minorities in Muslim-majority countries. According to the website for the conference (Marrakeshdeclaration.org), it was held under the auspices of the Moroccan King and the Moroccan Ministry of Endowments and Islamic Affairs, and sponsored by the Forum for the Promotion of Peace in Muslim societies, a UAE-based think tank headed by Sheikh ‘Abdullah bin Bayyah. It was attended by “hundreds of Muslim scholars and intellectuals from over 120 countries, along with representatives of Islamic and international organizations, as well as leaders from diverse religious groups and nationalities.”

On January 27, the participants issued a closing statement, the Marrakesh Declaration. The declaration presents the protection of minority rights as integral to Islamic heritage and history, as reflected, for example, in the 7th century Charter of Medina. According to the declaration, this charter contains “principles of constitutional contractual citizenship such as freedom of movement, property ownership, mutual solidarity and defense, as well as principles of justice and equality before the law” (For the text of the Medina Charter, see the Appendix).  The declaration states further that the situation of minorities in the Muslim world has “deteriorated dangerously” today due to the activity of “criminal groups” that “alarmingly distort [Islam’s] fundamental principles and goals.” It suggests to remedy the situation by reaffirming Muslims’ commitment to the Charter of Medina, and invokes this medieval document as a basis for guaranteeing human and citizen rights in the constitutions of modern Muslim states. It also calls for “Muslim educational institutions and authorities to conduct a courageous review of educational curricula.”

Sheikh ‘Abdullah bin Bayyah – the head of the UAE think tank that sponsored the conference – was prominently involved in similar initiatives in the past. In 2010 he initiated the New Mardin Declaration, which sought to address certain fatwas by 14th century Hanbali Muslim scholar Ibn Taymiyya that are invoked as authoritative by the takfiri Salafi-jihadi movement.[2] In 2014, the Sheikh was a prominent signatory of the open letter to ISIS “caliph”Al-Baghdadi that used Islamic sources to refute the Islamic State’s religious doctrine and to condemn the torture, murder and destruction committed by this organization.[3] However, both these initiatives failed to spark an intra-Muslim debate, let alone trigger significant action.

The Marrakesh Declaration’s call for educational reform did have some resonance. Morocco’s King Muhammad VI declared on February 6 that religious schoolbooks in Morocco must be reviewed. The Moroccan website illionweb.com commented: “When one admits that school plays a major role in shaping [people’s] minds and social skills, one realizes [what] impact instruction based on radical Islam and Salafist ideas can have… The King’s orders will enable combating radical theories… They insist on the need to write curricula and schoolbooks based on the values of the Moroccan people and the fundamentals of the [Moroccan] national identity, while remaining open to [other] societies rich in knowledge. It is [now] up to the relevant ministries to take action…”[4]

Read the entire critique and review at MEMRI.

The Marrakesh Declaration

Marrakesh mosque.jpg

The Rights of Religious Minorities in Predominantly Muslim Lands: Legal Framework and a Call to Action

Media Statement by Bishop Thompson Increases Tensions

Greg Thompson of Newcastle Australia.jpg

Bishop Greg Thompson has issued a media statement following the first report.

Some initial reactions:

  • He presents his diocese as having a uniform understanding on matters with no sense by many I’ve spoken to that the statement values or respects the evangelicals or Catholics in his diocese.
  • He conflates the topics of what he calls “gender equity”[sic.] and “marriage equality” and presents advocacy of both as a legitimate Anglican position. While there is clearly disagreement over the former (and Thompson does not fairly describe conservatives’ positions as he rejects them) the official and historical teaching on the latter is clear – that marriage is only between a man and a woman.
  • It is incorrect to say that the Sydney synod sought to hold other bishops accountable to them. Rather, they had expressed sorrow that those bishops would not hold themselves to promises they themselves had made, nor to the other bishops in Australia who they had made them with.
  • In the context of the statement it appears that when Thompson states “I am looking to the bishops of the Anglican Church of Australia to affirm the importance of being able to express divergent views in common fellowship” he is actually stating that Bishops in the Church should be allowed to express views contrary to the established teaching of the church and it’s official position, i.e. in direct contradiction of their consecration vows and charge to uphold the teaching of the church and refute error and false teaching.
  • More than one source in the diocese has spoken to me this morning of their incredulity that Thompson appeals to the 39 Articles and BCP in an ad clerum one week in order to assert his authority in the diocese and then the next week asserts his right to contradict the Articles and BCP. As one put it to me “his understanding of catholicity is very fluid”.

I hope to have more later today as this story develops.

update: The Newcastle Herald has a follow-up story summarising the statement and repeating some background.

This story first appeard at DavidOuld.net

Media Statement Anglican Diocese of Newcastle February 23 2016

Bishop Curry’s remarks to the Feb 2016 meeting of Executive Council

IMGP9733.JPG

The primates meeting, staff investigations and his health were addressed by the presiding bishop on 26 Feb 2016

Compromise reached over Govt plans to close Dublin churches

Christ Church Dublin.jpg

The closure of Dublin’s city centre Anglican churches on Easter Sunday over security concerns surrounding the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the 1916 Easter Rising has been lifted.

 

Confessional Lutherans & Anglicans Draw Closer Together

ACNA - LCMS meeting Feb 2016.jpg

Anglicans and Lutherans release interim report on their ongoing ecumenical dialogue.

Diocese of Egypt statement in response to Bishop Curry’s Good Friday appeal

Grant LeMarquand.jpg

“We would rather starve and not receive money from churches whose actions contradict the scriptures.”

Cathedral Premiere for Genesis Exhibition

3 The Potter.jpg

Gallery notes: Stephen Bird exhibition at Durham Cathedral

Christian divorce laws challenged on constitutional grounds

Alexander Malik at Lambeth 2008.jpg

Church of Pakistan leaders asked to advise Lahore high court

Grand Imam of al-Azhar denounces Episcopal Church bishops for being un-Christian

Ahmed_el-Tayeb_May_2015_(17963337671).jpg

Sheikh Amhed el-Tayeb tells Indonesian audience TEC has abandoned the Bible