Every year at about this time I am asked, “Why don’t you update what you believe – it doesn’t fit with modern Australia.” The subject lately has been same-sex marriage, but it has been a kaleidoscope of issues over the years.
When representatives of our churches meet at our annual Synod, we do so publicly. Our churches are open to all people in the suburbs of Sydney, the Illawarra and the Blue Mountains, so our governing body is public as well. We do not hide our beliefs, nor are we ashamed of them. People know what we believe and are free to comment on what we do and what we believe.
When I spoke this year about bishops as “guardians of the faith”, I was reflecting not only the doctrine of the Anglican Church, but also the ancient testimony of the early church right back to the time of the New Testament, when the apostle Paul charged his co-workers, Timothy and Titus, to “guard what was committed to your trust”.
Christian leaders, especially bishops, are called to teach this faith that was once for all entrusted to the people of God. I have sought to live my life according to the teaching of Jesus and his apostles. I do not always live up to these standards, but knowing that Christianity is a religion that is filled with grace, offering forgiveness of sins, then I am encouraged to repent when I have done wrong and seek God’s mercy, which he freely gives because of Jesus, who lived the life I could not live and died the death that I deserve.
Many in society think that I should “update the faith” rather than “guard the faith”. But that is not up to me or, may I say, up to any bishop of the church of God. The Bible tells us that Jesus is the author and perfector of our faith. We are not at liberty to change what he said, drop out bits that don’t suit us, or mould Jesus into what we would like him to be.
Many in society think that I should ‘update the faith’… But that is not up to me or, may I say, up to any bishop of the church of God.
When Christians in the first century, who had the person of Jesus in living memory, first started to speak, they were met with a mixture of disbelief, suspicion and violent opposition. Yet they persevered, despite the pressure to reshape Jesus into a more appealing image.
The pressure continues in every generation. I’m grateful if the worst thing Christians in Australia encounter in this century is social media outrage, for I am reminded of George Orwell’s saying: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
When I stated publicly that God defines marriage as an exclusive and permanent union between a man and a woman, I was merely restating what God has said and Jesus has affirmed. Everyone is free to believe what Jesus said or not. Everyone, that is, apart from me or any bishop because all bishops promise to teach nothing but what may be found in the Bible.
When I said “Please, leave us”, my words were directed at bishops of the church, and those who wish to change our doctrine, and I stand by those words. The words were not directed at members of our congregations, especially those who identify as gay, whether single or married.
It is regrettable that some have misrepresented my words, whether intentionally or unintentionally. In our churches, people are being nurtured in community. Some may have only recently come to know of Jesus or may be struggling, as we all do at times, in following his ways. We must be careful not to over-reach or under-value either Jesus’ compassion or his commands. Yet for we who wish to follow Christ, commit themselves to him in faith and obedience, then it is his teaching we must seek to follow.
This is why I stand where I stand.
Excellent statement sir!
From the letter of Jude..
“3 Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. 4 For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.”
Christians who rely on Christ for salvation must in the grace and power of the Holy Spirit also stand up for Him.
Dr. Davies directs his “please leave” to “bishops…and those who wish to change our doctrine”. Surely he should explicitly include priests and deacons as well as bishops? And what about those who have no desire to “change our doctrine” but who nevertheless openly live in ways contrary to that doctrine, as many are doing now? If the church takes no action to expel such people, either through inability or for some other reason, then the plea for them to leave becomes an empty form of words. They already know where they stand. They obviously have no intention of leaving. What typically happens next is a power struggle over doctrine and finally over church property. My prediction is that it is more likely to be Dr. Davies and his supporters who leave. The others are obviously in this for the long haul, and have abundant popular support from all levels of the wider society and most of the media and educational institutions.
I’m a quiet person. In social settings I’m inclined to give non-committal responses rather than say something that will incite an unproductive argument. The result of this is that acquaintances have sometimes come to the conclusion that I am “on their side” on a given issue when I am in fact not.
Sometimes this results in confidences that I’ve found rather shocking. An older member of the LGBT community once confided to me that he and a group of friends had been trying to exert pressure on churches to change their theology. It wasn’t working. They concluded that in order to be effective they needed to actually join the churches they were trying to influence. Once they did this, the influence they sought to wield became much more effective.
For me, this anecdotal evidence of a strategic and coordinated Trojan horse attack, has made me less idealistic. Which is to say it’s made me a stronger advocate for clear theology (rather than “pastoral approaches”) and actual church discipline (rather than comfortably ignoring moral issues).
You might find it interesting to check out what is happening in the Methodist Church UK. There is a (rather long) discussion document entitled “God in love unites us.” You will find it on the Methodist main website.
I have been exploring how these things have been able to infiltrate the Methodist denomination, and I found that the Methodist Conference has a synod very similar to the Anglican synod, and some synod reps with an agenda have been able to manouvre proceedings in a way which is favourable to their cause. There is a much smaller document known as “The Clobber Verses”, which seeks to twist Scripture to mean somethiing other than was plainly intended..
But essentially all these problems have arisen because good Christian people have not stood firm in defence of the Gospel.
As Sir Edmund Burke is reputed to have said, “All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”