HomePress ReleasesSweden rejects midwife's plea to be excused from conducting abortions

Sweden rejects midwife’s plea to be excused from conducting abortions

Published on

Please Help Anglican.Ink with a donation.

Swedish Appeal Court rules abortion to be a greater right than the call of conscience for medical staff

Jönköping – Should a midwife have to choose between following her conscience or pursuing her career? On 12 April 2017 the Swedish Labour Court of Appeal, in refusing to protect freedom of conscience, found that midwives could be asked to make that choice. The judgment contradicts international law protecting conscientious objection. Ellinor Grimmark, a Swedish midwife who filed the appeal, must now decide whether to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights.

“The Court has failed to protect Ellinor Grimmark’s fundamental right to freedom of conscience despite the clear legal protections that exist in international law. Some have attempted to frame this case as one that pits one human right against another. However, the only person whose rights have been violated is Ellinor Grimmark,” said Robert Clarke, Director of European Advocacy for ADF International.

Three different medical clinics in the district of Jönköping had refused to employ Ms. Grimmark because she would not assist with abortions in light of her convictions about the dignity of all human life. However, in November 2015, a district court found that Ms. Grimmark’s right to freedom of conscience had not been violated. It required her to pay the local government’s legal costs, amounting to 100,000 EUR. ADF International filed an expert brief in support of her case, highlighting the protection for freedom of conscience that exists under international law.

“The desire to protect life is what leads many midwives and nurses to enter the medical profession in the first place. Instead of forcing desperately needed midwives out of a profession, states should look to safeguard the moral convictions of their staff. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has affirmed that ‘no person, hospital or institution shall be coerced, held liable or discriminated against in any manner because of a refusal to perform, accommodate, assist or submit to an abortion,’” added Clarke.

Latest articles

Bishop Lopes takes on Australian portfolio as the Anglican Ordinariate streamlines operations

Pope Leo XIV has appointed Bishop Steven Lopes of the Personal Ordinariate of the...

Catholic Training in Beijing Centered on Xi Jinping, Not the Pope’s Magisterium

Catholics nationwide are being asked to implement the instructions of the 2026 national training session...

‘Antisemitism is evil, it must be confronted wherever it appears’, Bishop Lusa tells rally

Address to the Standing Strong: Extinguish Antisemitism rally on May 10, 2026 Friends, We gather...

New York man sentenced to prison for Hate Crime against Episcopal rector

A 32-year-old New York man has been sentenced to one-and-one-third to four years in...

Analysis: The Abuja “Contradiction” That Isn’t

Jay Thomas's recent First Things essay "Anglicans and the Abuja Contradiction" purports to expose...

More like this

Bishop Lopes takes on Australian portfolio as the Anglican Ordinariate streamlines operations

Pope Leo XIV has appointed Bishop Steven Lopes of the Personal Ordinariate of the...

Catholic Training in Beijing Centered on Xi Jinping, Not the Pope’s Magisterium

Catholics nationwide are being asked to implement the instructions of the 2026 national training session...

‘Antisemitism is evil, it must be confronted wherever it appears’, Bishop Lusa tells rally

Address to the Standing Strong: Extinguish Antisemitism rally on May 10, 2026 Friends, We gather...