Church leaders urge NZ govt to reject euthanasia bill

0
55

Catholic and Anglican bishops have joined with the President of the NZ Federation of Islamic Associations, and Baptist, Lutheran, Presbyterian church leaders and the Salvation Army in a letter urging Members of Parliament to reject the ‘End of Life Choice’ (EOLC) Bill.

The faith leaders offered their concerns that come from time spent listening at the bedsides of people in their last days of life,

“We speak out of our extensive experience of actively caring for the dying and their whānau.” state the leaders in their letter. 

“We understand very well the stresses and fears as well as the opportunities and gifts associated with the dying process. We know the need for, and the effectiveness of, quality, holistic and compassionate end of life palliative care – care that is able to address not just the physical suffering of people who are dying, but also their, and their whānau /friends’, emotional, spiritual and psychological suffering.” they write.

The letter offers parliamentarians seven ethical, philosophical and practical reasons why the faith leaders see that the EOLC Bill falls short of the mark as it comes up for its third and final reading on Wednesday 13 November.

Their reasons for opposing the Bill are:

1. More radical powers to administer death

The EOLC Bill offers greater powers to administer death than comparable laws in Australia by allowing a doctor to administer drugs that directly end a person’s life (euthanasia) on top of allowing for assisted suicide (where doctors provide the means for a person to end their own life).

2. Unfair access to ‘a good death’

The leaders note that palliative care is not equally available to all New Zealanders, but changes according to where people live or how much money they have to spend on their care. This means that palliative care at the end of life is not available to all, which will lead to:

“…a strong likelihood that New Zealanders will also choose assisted death because of a lack of other meaningful choices. In such a context, there is the real risk that people in lower socio-economic groups will find themselves being channelled unnecessarily and unjustly towards a premature death.” 

3. Unproven links to normalising of suicide

In overseas jurisdictions where assisted suicide has been legalised there are documented rises in non-assisted suicides. Until the causal link has been ruled out for the normalising effect of assisted suicide on suicide rates this is reason for holding back on law change. 

4. Fear and loneliness often drive suicide choice

Evidence from assisted suicide records in the US state of Oregon shows that assisted deaths are often chosen for reasons that are existential rather than physical, death is the choice due to patients’ fears of social isolation, being a ‘burden to others’ or living with disability, rather than pain.

5. Safeguards shift once assisted suicide becomes legal

In Canada the safeguard of confining assisted deaths to patients with terminal illness has been removed through subsequent legal argument. Legally-assisted deaths have now been extended to cases of people with disabilities or long-term conditions. 

6. Treating depression requires resources

Referrals for psychological assessment and support for people choosing death are rare in overseas cases of assisted suicide. Our mental health system is already overburdened and this important safeguard of psycho-social support could not necessarily be supported by our mental health services.

7. Religious carers and healthcare institutions cannot opt out

The EOLC Bill does not include the right of institutions to opt out of euthanasia or assisted suicide provision on the basis of conscience. This would directly affect religious hospitals and rest homes who wished to not comply with offering assisted suicides or euthanasia for ethical reasons.

The letter concludes with two positive moves the faith leaders say would do more to improve end of life choices for all Aotearoa New Zealanders – through improved end of life care. These would ideally include :

1. Extending the availability of palliative care to all people in Aotearoa New Zealand regardless of where we live or how much we have to spend.

2. Resourcing mental health and wellbeing services and better community engagement to counteract social isolation and depression amongst our elders. 

The letter was signed by Cardinal John Dew and the Catholic Bishops of Auckland, Wellington, Hamilton and Christchurch, Archbishop Don Tamihere, Archbishop Philip Richardson and nine further Anglican bishops, plus the Salvation Army Territorial Commander Andrew Westrupp, Islamic Associations President Mustafa Farouk, Lutheran Bishop Mark Whitfield, Presbyterian Moderator Fakaofo Kaio and Baptist National leader Charles Hewlett. 

The full text of the joint letter is available here: Faith Leaders Letter on EOLC Bill.pdf 128.05 kB